Employee AI Assistant

Competitive, heuristic and survey analysis

Competitive analysis

I reviewed other generative AI programs and identified commonalities, strengths and weaknesses.

Most applications supplement the text input field with pre-set actions the AI can take.

A text-entry box with buttons of actions the AI can take beneath it.

Starting an interaction with Jasper

Beneath the ChatGPT logo are four suggested actions to begin an interaction.

Starting an interaction with ChatGPT

Editing parts of the AI's output was a common capability, while the granularity of control varied.

Rows of text with a portion highlighted. Buttons to edit the text appear below the highlight.
Rows of text with a portion highlighted. Buttons to edit the text appear below the highlight.

Editing the output in Jasper

Some features were not found in all applications.

HuggingChat's toggle to search the web

Google Gemini presents alternative versions of output.

Heuristic evaluation of the current state

I reviewed the current state of the AI application and graded areas of improvement based on severity of impact to the user—from task-impeding to nice-to-have.

Examples of issues that prevent the user from completing their task.

A colorful note contains a comment on the wordy interface beneath.

Content is not organized or easy to digest.

A colorful note contains a comment on the technical interface beneath.

Settings aren't remembered by the application.

Examples of issues that add significant effort to complete a task.

Colorful notes contain comments on the wordy interface beneath.

Edits can't be made to the output. A user would have to start over and re-generate the summary.

A colorful note contains a comment on the technical interface beneath.

The technical descriptions are not helpful to most users.

Minor issues—like misleading or inconvenient UI—lengthen task duration.

Colorful notes contain comments on the disorganized interface beneath.

Because of the copy button's placement, it's unclear what content will be captured. The sources must be copied manually.

There were opportunities to add new functions that increase value for the user.

A colorful note contains a comment on the technical interface beneath.

Adding the capability of comparing different outputs on one screen would save users effort.

Survey

I drafted a survey to measure employees' use and perceived value of the AI application.

Colorful boxes hold questions with mutlitple response options.

Questions collected info on which features of the application supported employees' workflows.

Problem statements

From the research I synthesized problem statements to guide design decisions and priorities. Problems can be grouped broadly into two categories:

  1. Surface-level problems that are small individually, and can be addressed with low effort from the development team.

  2. Functional problems that require restructuring of the application and more effort from the development team.

Problem statements are grouped and colored by theme.

Feature prioritization

From these methods I determined the features that were most impactful to users and prioritized them in the project timeline.

General
• Simple interface • Supportive content and guidance • Responsive design with feedback
• History of past interactions • Auxiliary resources (FAQs, directions, etc.)
• Save, share and export

Summary function
• Library to organize and access documents •Preview document when uploading
• Remembering past settings • Edit and re-generate output • Compare output

Document Q&A function
• Library to organize and access documents • Tagging data when uploading

Prompt function
• Library to store and share prompts • Web and 3rd-party integration

From these methods I determined the features that were most impactful to users and prioritized them in the project timeline.

General
• Simple interface • Supportive content and guidance
• Responsive design with feedback • History of past interactions
• Auxiliary resources (FAQs, directions, etc.)
• Save, share and export

Summary function
• Library to organize and access documents
• Preview document when uploading • Remembering past settings
• Edit and re-generate output • Compare output

Document Q&A function
• Library to organize and access documents
• Tagging data when uploading

Prompt function
• Library to store and share prompts • Web and 3rd-party integration

From these methods I determined the features that were most impactful to users and prioritized them in the project timeline.

General
• Simple interface
• Supportive content and guidance
• Responsive design with feedback
• History of past interactions
• Auxiliary resources (FAQs, directions, etc.)
• Save, share and export

Summary function
• Library to organize and access documents
•Preview document when uploading
• Remembering past settings
• Edit and re-generate output
• Compare output

Document Q&A function
• Library to organize and access documents
• Tagging data when uploading

Prompt function
• Library to store and share prompts
• Web and 3rd-party integration